University departments use Testomatik to generate coursework and exam items from their own lecture material, targeted at analysis and evaluation rather than recall. Each item arrives with a worked rationale and a cognitive-level tag, and departments run under one account with a budget ceiling.
No card required to trial · Invoicing available for institutions
The gap in most generated question sets is cognitive level. That is the part this is built to control.
Undergraduate assessment lives at Analyze and Evaluate, which is exactly where hand-written question sets thin out. You set the Bloom distribution rather than hoping the source text produces it.
Generate multiple non-identical versions from the same lecture material for large cohorts, resit sittings and practice sets, without reusing a paper students have already seen.
Multiple choice, open ended, matching, true/false and fill-in-the-blank, plus visual items with generated charts and diagrams for quantitative disciplines.
Each item arrives with its answer, a worked explanation and a cognitive-level tag — the material a moderation or exam board meeting actually needs.
An organisation account groups your staff, their usage and your spending under one roof.
Uploaded lecture material is encrypted at rest on EU-based servers with GDPR-compliant processing, and generated output passes safety and moderation filters.
Group teaching staff and demonstrators under one organisation, invite by email with roles, and see usage per member rather than one opaque total.
Per-question pricing with an organisation budget ceiling, and billing details with a tax ID on file so finance can be invoiced rather than paying by card.
The agent that writes an item does not grade its own difficulty — a separate classifier assigns the Bloom level, so the tag carries information rather than self-assessment.
That depends on targeting it correctly. Because you set the Bloom's Taxonomy distribution before generation, you can request items concentrated at Analyze, Evaluate and Create rather than accepting recall-level questions that suit school assessment but not a degree module.
Yes. The same lecture material can produce repeated, non-identical item sets — useful for large cohorts sitting in multiple rooms, resit papers and practice sets that do not leak the real exam.
Every item is delivered with its correct answer, a worked explanation and its cognitive-level tag, which is the documentation a moderator or external examiner typically asks for. Items remain fully editable before approval.
It is stored encrypted on EU-based servers with GDPR-compliant processing. Items are generated from your material, using your terminology, rather than drawn from a shared question bank.
Per question, not per staff seat, with an organisation-level budget ceiling you set. Billing details and a tax ID can be held on file so your finance office receives an invoice instead of card transactions.
Yes — 5 questions free without a card, generated from one of your own lecture chapters. For a departmental evaluation, contact us and we can discuss a larger pilot.